The best WordPress plugin is not the one with the most positive opinions. It is the one that meets a specific need without weakening the architecture of the site.
This distinction may seem trivial. She's not. After having audited dozens of WordPress projects in production, the observation is systematic: the most difficult sites to maintain do not suffer from a bad choice of theme, nor from a failed server configuration. They suffer from an accumulation of plugins installed without doctrine, without governance, and without anticipation of consequences.
Each plugin is a dependency. Each dependency must be maintained, tested with every update of WordPress, secure, documented and understood by the people who intervene on the project.
The quality of a WordPress stack is not measured by the number of features it embarks, but by the relevance of its components and the ability of the team to maintain them in time.
Why did the choice of a plugin become an architectural decision?
WordPress has changed profoundly. The heart itself now incorporates features that, five years ago, required a plugin: block editor, menu management via Gutenberg, customization via the Full Site Editing. This evolution mechanically reduces the need for plugins for generic functions and moves needs to more specific uses.
At the same time, plugins have become more powerful – and therefore more intrusive. A cache plugin intercepts HTTP requests. A form plugin can record sensitive data. A d的analytics plugin injects JavaScript into each page. A security plugin changes rules at the server or WordPress level itself. Each of these components touches a critical layer of the platform.
For companies that operate WordPress sites with high audience or in regulatory contexts forced (GDPR, financial sector, health, education), « install plugin for everything » is no longer a viable option. The consequences of a poorly maintained or misconfigured plugin can be significant: data leakage, performance degradation, functional regression after updating, or even compromise security.
What experience of Be API shows
On the legacy projects we audit, recurring problems do not come from an initial bad intention. They usually return in three forms:
- Plugins installed to meet a one-time need and never deleted.
- Redundant plugins covering the same functional perimeter (two cache plugins, two SEO plugins, two form plugins).
- Plugins abandoned by their editor but still active, without anyone being able to remove them without risking regression.
The technical debt of a WordPress project is not only in the custom code. It is very often in the stack of plugins.
To be noted: An installed plugin is a long-term commitment. It must be validated, maintained, documented and assumed by the project management team.
How to choose a good WordPress plugin in 2026?
Before installing anything, it is useful to have a clear assessment grid. Here are the criteria that we consistently apply.
Maintenance
Is the plugin regularly updated? Is the latest version less than six months old? Is it compatible with the latest stable version of WordPress? A plugin that has not been updated for more than a year is a strong warning signal, regardless of its popularity.
Editor's reputation
Who maintains this plugin? A company with a clear business model, an active independent developer, a recognized foundation? The reputation of the publisher determines the sustainability of the support and the responsiveness to security flaws.
Quality of code
Does the plugin follow the WordPress Coding Standards? Is he auditable? Does it use obsolete practices (direct SQL requests without $wpdb, no nuncios, no escapes)? On sensitive projects, a partial audit of the source code is not superfluous.
WordPress compatibility
Has the plugin been tested with the WordPress heart, Gutenberg and modern themes that are based on the Full Site Editing? A plugin that works correctly on a classic installation can introduce conflicts on a Headless architecture or a VIP WordPress environment.
Performance
What is the real impact of the plugin on response times? How many SQL queries does he add on average? Does it inject scripts or styles on all pages, including those where it is not used? These questions must be answered before production, not after.
Security
Does the plugin have known and uncorrected vulnerabilities? Consult WPScan Vulnerability Database is part of the evaluation process. A popular plugin may have a history of faults that make it an informed risk, or a risk to be eliminated.
Documentation
Is the documentation up to date? Does it cover advanced use cases? Poor documentation on a complex plugin is a signal that the learning curve will be the responsibility of your team.
Facility for uninstallation
What happens if we disable this plugin? Does it properly delete its database tables? His metadata? His options? A plugin that leaves traces after uninstall is a plugin that takes hostage some of your data.
Impact on architecture
Does the plugin conflict with other components of the stack (cache, CDN, cache object, mu-plugins)? Is it compatible with high availability infrastructure, a multi-site environment, or Bedrock deployment?
Assessment grid
| Criteria | Why it's important | Risk if ignored |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | An unmaintained plugin accumulates faults | Safety compensation, regression after WP update |
| Reputation editor | Condition the sustainability of the support | Sudden drop, no patch on faults |
| Quality of code | Performance impact, safety and sustainability | Technical debt, vulnerabilities, conflicts |
| Compatibility WP | WP is evolving; plugins must follow | Regressions to each version climb |
| Performance | Each plugin consumes resources | Response time degradation, SEO impact |
| Security | Plugins are the first attack surface | SQL injection, XSS, escalation of privileges |
| Documentation | Condition the team's ability to operate | Dependence on editor, difficulty debug |
| Facility for uninstallation | Avoid base residues and on-board effects | Orphan data, latent conflicts |
| Impact architecture | A plugin can break a stack by interaction | Pannes, incompatibilities CDN/cache/multisite |
Concrete case: On a recast project for a large account in the higher education sector, we found 54 plugins active in production. After audit, 17 were redundant or could be replaced by lighter specific development. 6 had not been updated for more than 18 months. 3 had known uncorrected VECs. The technical overhaul started there, before even touching on the theme.
Most used plugins at Be API
Back field: stack observed on 108 WordPress projects.
These plugins regularly appear in our production stacks. Their presence is no coincidence. They were selected because they pass the evaluation grid, because their publishers are serious, and because they are properly integrated into demanding architectures.
| Plugin | Main use | Why he often comes back |
|---|---|---|
| Yoast SEO | SEO on-page, sitemaps, Open Graph | De facto reference, expandable API, VIP WordPress compatible |
| Redirection | Management of redirections 301/302, logs 404 | Stable, lightweight, reliable on thousands of rules |
| WP Rocket | HTTP cache, preloading, front optimization | Immediate results, granular configuration |
| WP Sentry Integration | Monitoring PHP and JavaScript errors | Essential in serious production |
| BBQ Pro | Light Firewall WordPress side | First line of defense, without heavy configuration |
| WP Cerber | Application security, gross force, 2FA | Covers several needs in one serious component |
| Two-Factor | Two-factor authentication | Simple, efficient, without fioriture |
| Stream | WordPress activity log | Traceability of admin actions, indispensable in team |
| Advanced Custom Fields Pro | Custom Fields | De facto standard for content architectures |
| Gravity Forms | Complex forms | Robustness, API, CRM and SI integrations |
| FacetWP | Content filtering | Performance on large volumes of data |
| Google Tag Manager for WordPress | GTM integration | Delegation of marketing tags without technical intervention |
| Safe SVG | Secure SVG Upload | Makes SVG upload possible without opening XSS fault |
| Multisite Enhancements | Multisite network administration | Provides what is missing natively in network interfaces |
These plugins are rarely spectacular. They don't make impressive demo demonstrations. They are mainly used to fiabilize, monitor, maintain and industrialize. These are production tools, not sales tools.
The best WordPress plugins by use
Yoast SEO
What's it for?
Yoast SEO manages the SEO on-page configuration: meta tags, Open Graph tags for social networks, XML sitemap generation, breadcrumb management, and readability and content optimization analysis.
Why Be API recommends it
This is the most audible, documented WordPress SEO plugin, and the one whose API is the most stable for customizations. It is compatible with WordPress VIP and benefits from a dedicated team that closely follows the evolutions of the WordPress heart. On multilingual projects, it integrates correctly with WPML or Polylang.
Its limits
On sites with very specific content architectures (post complex custom types, nested taxonomy), Yoast's automatic SEO rules can conflict with business logic. These customizations must be anticipated rather than discovered in production.
When do you prefer a specific development?
If the project has very specific SEO needs (marking) Schema.org A specific development complementing Yoast is often more relevant than an additional plugin.
Criticality Level: High – It is at the heart of the organic visibility flow of the site.
Redirection
What's it for?
Redirecting manages HTTP redirections (301, 302, 307), monitors 404 errors, and automates certain redirections based on conditions (user agent, referent, language). It keeps an access log to analyze problematic URLs.
Why Be API recommends it
Its stability over large volumes of rules is tested. It is expandable via an API. On migrations involving thousands of URLs to redirect, it remains reliable where some plugins more « visual » Show their limits.
Its limits
On very large volumes (more than 10,000 rules), performance can become a topic. In this case, it is better to manage redirects at the server (NGINX, Varnish) or CDN level.
When do you prefer a specific development?
When redirection rules are algorithmically generable from the database structure. A migration script can directly produce NGINX configurations or redirect entries without going through the interface.
Criticality level: Medium – Criticism only during migrations and recasts.
WP Rocket
What's it for?
WP Rocket is an HTTP cache plugin for WordPress. It manages page caches, the minification and concatenation of CSS/JS Assets, preloading, lazy loading of images and iframes, and cache of objects. It integrates with the main CDNs.
Why Be API recommends it
It produces measurable results quickly. Its configuration is granular and its options are clearly documented. On projects where the infrastructure does not allow to configure Varnish or an HTTP cache at the server level, WP Rocket remains the best option on WordPress.
Its limits
WP Rocket does not replace an HTTP cache at the infrastructure level. On a stack with Varnish or advanced Nginx configuration, there may be interactions to anticipate carefully. It also does not solve performance problems related to third party scripts (Google Ads, ChatBot, social widgets), which remain the primary source of degradation of Core Web Vitals in most projects.
When do you prefer a specific development?
On sites whose architecture involves user-specific content or highly dynamic pages, the cache of static pages is irrelevant. The cache strategy must then be treated at infrastructure level.
Criticality Level: High – On WordPress projects « Standard »This is the most immediate performance lever.
WP Sentry Integration
What's it for?
WP Sentry Integration connects WordPress to the Sentry monitoring platform. It captures and raises PHP and JavaScript errors occurring in production, with their context (WP version, PHP, URL, connected user if relevant).
Why Be API recommends it
A WordPress site without monitoring errors is a blind site. WP Sentry Integration is the easiest way to get real visibility on what happens in production. It detects silent errors that do not appear in server logs and that users do not necessarily go back.
Its limits
Sentry is a paid external platform (with a limited free offer). Filtering must be properly configured to avoid going back to non-actionable events (benign PHP notices, non-correctable third-party plugin errors).
When do you prefer a specific development?
Never. If you operate a WordPress site in serious production, monitoring errors is not an option.
Criticality Level: High – Indispensable in production.
BBQ Pro
What's it for?
BBQ Pro (Block Bad Queries) is an application side security plugin. It filters malicious requests before they reach WordPress: SQL injections, directory crossing, XSS reflected, vulnerability scans.
Why Be API recommends it
It is ultra-light (no complex administration interface, no own database) and efficient on automated attacks. It is a first line of defence relevant to infrastructure that does not have a WAF at network level.
Its limits
It does not replace a dedicated WAF (ModSecurity, Cloudflare WAF, AWS WAF) on projects with high criticality. It covers common vectors, not sophisticated attacks.
When do you prefer a specific development?
No relevant specific development here. If the need exceeds BBQ Pro, it is a WAF infrastructure that must be deployed, not additional WordPress code.
Criticality level: Medium – Useful in addition to infrastructure security.
WP Cerber
What's it for?
WP Cerber protects against brute attacks on login forms, manages the limitation of authentication attempts, offers an application firewall, and incorporates a two-factor authentication option (2FA). It also offers file integrity scanning functions.
Why Be API recommends it
It covers several layers of WordPress application security in one serious plugin. On projects where protection against brute force cannot be removed to the infrastructure level (fail2ban, Nginx rules), WP Cerber is the best option.
Its limits
The free version is limited. The cloud version adds functionality but introduces dependence on an external service. On VIP WordPress environments, the constraints of the platform impose different solutions.
When do you prefer a specific development?
If the brute force can be treated at the Nginx or Varnish level, it is preferable. Flow limitation rules (rate limiting) at the server level are more efficient and do not add PHP load.
Criticality Level: High – Authentication security is non-negotiable.
Two-Factor
What's it for?
Two-Factor adds authentication to two factors (2FA) on WordPress accounts. It supports TOTP applications (Google Authenticator, Authy), FIDO2/WebAuthn security keys, and email codes.
Why Be API recommends it
This is the cleanest plugin 2FA WordPress technically: maintained by a serious team (direct contributions in the WordPress heart), without unnecessary interface, without upsell. On projects with administrator accounts or sensitive publisher accesses, this is the first security measure to be imposed.
Its limits
It does not manage existing sessions during activation. A user may temporarily bypass the protection if activation is not immediate and mandatory.
When do you prefer a specific development?
If user management is integrated into a corporate SSO (Okta, Azure AD), the 2FA must be managed at the level of the identity provider, not by WordPress.
Criticality Level: High – Mandatory on any site with sensitive access.
Stream
What's it for?
Stream records all actions performed in WordPress administration: content changes, configuration changes, plugin activations/deactivations, user connections, role changes. It produces a searchable and filterable audit journal.
Why Be API recommends it
In projects where several people have access to administration, traceability of actions is essential. Stream allows to respond to « Who changed that and when? » without having to search the server logs. It is also a compliance tool for projects subject to audit requirements.
Its limits
It can generate a large volume of data on very active sites. Log retention must be configured to avoid uncontrolled database growth.
When do you prefer a specific development?
While audit requirements are very high (bank, health, public sector), an external logging system (ELK, Splunk) offers additional guarantees on log integrity and retention.
Criticality level: Medium – Becomes High on multi-user projects or subject to compliance obligations.
Advanced Custom Fields Pro
What's it for?
ACF Pro creates custom fields for WordPress content types: text, image, relationship, repeater, group, gallery, and dozens of other types. He interfaces with Gutenberg to expose these fields in the block editor.
Why Be API recommends it
ACF Pro is the de facto standard for custom content architectures in WordPress. Its PHP API is stable, well documented, and flexible enough to cover complex data structures. On projects with rich post-type custom (product catalogue, directories, complex profiles), it is a fundamental.
Its limits
ACF Pro can become a strong coupling point if its API is used directly in all templates. An abstraction (helpers functions, restitory pattern) is recommended to limit the impact of possible migration.
When do you prefer a specific development?
For very specific needs (very intertwined data structures, highly custom editing interfaces), the development of a Gutenberg full custom block can be more relevant than a complex ACF assembly.
Criticality Level: High – It is often the plugin on which the entire content architecture rests.
Gravity Forms
What's it for?
Gravity Forms is an advanced forms plugin for WordPress. It allows to create complex forms with conditional logic, file upload, integrated payment, and many integrations: CRM, SI, email marketing, webhook.
Why Be API recommends it
Its robustness on complex forms is proven. Its API is well designed and allows important customizations without touching the core of the plugin. On enterprise projects that need to connect forms to an internal CRM or SI, Gravity Forms is the most reliable choice.
Its limits
It is a premium plugin with an annual license template. On simple needs (a contact form), it is oversized.
When do you prefer a specific development?
If the forms are to be integrated with very specific internal APIs, a custom form with direct integration may be cleaner than a Gravity Forms encapsulation.
Criticality level: Medium – Critique only on projects where forms are at the heart of the user journey.
FacetWP
What's it for?
FacetWP adds advanced filtering features on WordPress listings: filters by taxonomy, ACF field, meta, price range, location. It optimizes the performance of filtering queries on large volumes of data.
Why Be API recommends it
He does one thing and does it well. On sites with catalogues of several thousand entries (real estate, training, products), FacetWP delivers performance that home solutions take time to achieve. Its integration with ACF Pro is natural.
Its limits
It introduces its own cache logic and can interact with HTTP cache solutions if filtering URLs are not correctly excluded.
When do you prefer a specific development?
On Headless architectures or the front is not WordPress, filtering is done directly via REST API or GraphQL. FacetWP is relevant only on WordPress architectures Traditional or ESF.
Criticality level: Medium – Site reviews with search/screening features at the heart of the product.
Google Tag Manager for WordPress
What's it for?
This plugin inserts the Google Tag Manager snippet into the WordPress pages: tag in the head and Noscript in the body, with the right technical locations and GDPR compliance options.
Why Be API recommends it
GTM is the standard for managing marketing and analytics tags (Google Analytics, Meta pixels, customization scripts). This plugin does the minimum required: insert the snippet correctly without any additional logic. Tag management is deported in GTM, which is exactly the right architecture.
Its limits
GTM itself is a potential source of performance degradation if it is misused on the marketing side. The plugin itself is neutral, but it opens the door to injection of third-party scripts not controlled by the technical team.
When do you prefer a specific development?
The insertion of the GTM snippet can be done in a few lines in the theme or via a mu-plugin. On highly controlled architectures, not having an additional plugin for this can simplify the stack.
Criticality Level: Low – Technically simple, but strategically important for marketing teams.
Safe SVG
Safe SVG allows the upload of SVG files in the WordPress media library by sanitizing them (sanitization) to eliminate XSS vectors (onboard scripts, JavaScript events, malicious external references).
Why Be API recommends it
By default, WordPress blocks SVG upload because SVGs can contain executable code. Safe SVG solves this problem properly, without simply disabling the safety restriction. It is a simple solution to a common problem.
Its limits
Sanitization may alter some complex SVGs. Critical SVGs (icons, illustrations) must be tested after activation.
When do you prefer a specific development?
If the need for SVG upload only concerns technical users, a mu-plugin solution managing the role restriction is more granular.
Criticality Level: Low – But necessary as soon as we need SVG in the media library.
Multisite Enhancements
What's it for?
Multisite Enhancements brings improvements to the multisite WordPress network administration interface: better access to network sites, additional information in the lists, useful shortcuts for super admins.
Why Be API recommends it
The Multisite WordPress interface is significantly incomplete for large networks. This plugin fills obvious gaps without introducing business logic. On networks of 20 or more sites, it quickly becomes indispensable for administrative teams.
Its limits
It is a plugin to improve interface, no critical functionality. His absence doesn't break anything.
When do you prefer a specific development?
If the network management needs are very specific (personal reporting, automation between sites), a specific development in mu-plugin is more suitable.
Criticality Level: Low – Comfort of use, no functional criticality.
The plugins that it is better to avoid... by situation
Not mentioning a plugin by its name to disqualify it is not the relevant approach. What matters is to recognize risk patterns.
| Situation | Why it's risky | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Plugin abandoned (more update since 18+ months) | Uncorrected vulnerabilities, future WP incompatibilities | Specific development, plugin maintained equivalent |
| Plugin « all-in-one » (SEO + cache + security + form) | Cannot replace partially, strong coupling | Stack of specialized plugins, easier to evolve |
| Functional duplicate (two cache plugins, two SEO plugins) | Conflicts, unnecessary overhead, confusion about responsibility | Audit and deletion of one of the two |
| Plugin injecting heavy JS on all pages | Degradation of Core Web Vitals, including LCP and TBT | Load scripts only on affected pages, or lighter solution |
| Plugin locking contents in its own format | Impossible migration without data loss | Focus plugins that store in native HTML or standard Gutenberg blocks |
| Plugin without clear economic model | Risk of abandonment or resale to questionable actors | Evaluate editor's durability before installation |
Remember: this is not the plugin that is bad. This is the lack of governance around the plugin. A wrongly chosen plugin in a strong governance context will be removed. An acceptable plugin in a non-existent governance context will eventually become a problem.
Plugin, specific development or AI: how to decide?
The question of arbitration between existing plugin and specific development is a question that technical teams have long been asking. IA changes this arbitration, but does not remove it.
| Need | Plugin | Specific development | IA + expert review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard function (cache, SEO, basic form) | First choice | Rarely justified | Not relevant |
| Micro-specific functionality | Often oversized | Preferred | IA accelerates writing |
| Business function (CRM integration, SI owner) | Insufficient | Required | IA can generate architecture and basic code |
| Security | Specific plugins (Cerber, BBQ) | Preferred infrastructure layer | Code audit, no generation |
| Performance | WP Rocket or layer infrastructure | Sometimes (lazy loading specific) | Profiling, no generation |
| SI connection (REST API, webhook, sync) | Rarely adequate | Almost always | IA generates connection code and adapters |
The AIA changes arbitration in two concrete ways. First, it reduces the cost of specific development: what took a senior developer two days can take a few hours with an expert review. Then it allows to generate own code on perimeters well defined (an API adapter, a Gutenberg block, a synchronization service) without introducing the complexity of a third party plugin.
But you have to be clear about its limits. IA accelerates code writing. It does not replace tests, architecture, or code review. A component generated by IA without expert review is no more reliable than a plugin installed without evaluation. The rigour of the process does not change.
Example of professional WordPress stack
This stack is a basis for discussion, not a universal recipe. It corresponds to a type project « institutional or editorial site enterprise » with high performance, safety and maintenance constraints.
| Plugin | Role | Interest | Interactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yoast SEO | SEO on-page, XML sitemaps | Organic visibility | WP Rocket Compatible for Sitemaps |
| WP Rocket | HTTP cache, front optimization | Immediate perceptible performance | To be configured with CDN and Varnish if present |
| WP Sentry Integration | Monitoring PHP/JS Errors | Visibility production | No conflicting interaction |
| WP Cerber | Application security, gross force, 2FA | Access protection | Can interact with proxies (IP forwarding to check) |
| Two-Factor | 2FA if Cerber not retained | Security authentication | Independent |
| Stream | Audit log | Traceability | None |
| Advanced Custom Fields Pro | Content Architecture | Business flexibility | Interface with Gutenberg |
| Gravity Forms | Complex forms | Robustness and integration | Can connect to webhooks SI |
| Google Tag Manager for WordPress | GTM integration | Marketing/technical decoupling | No interaction on WordPress side |
| Redirection | Management of redirections | Post-migration stability | Compatible with most caches |
| Safe SVG | Secure SVG Upload | Graphic quality | None |
| BBQ Pro | Application Firewall | Defense in depth | Complementary to Cerber |
This stack covers the needs of the vast majority of enterprise projects without overloading the architecture. On a VIP WordPress project, several of these components will be replaced or supplemented by platform solutions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best WordPress SEO plugin?
Yoast SEO is the reference choice for most projects. It is maintained, expandable, compatible VIP WordPress, and has a stable API for customization. Rank Math is a credible alternative on projects where Yoast's native features are insufficient. The choice criterion is not the number of features but the compatibility with your architecture and the stability of the editor.
How many plugins can be installed?
There's no magic number. What matters is the quality of each plugin, the absence of duplicates, and the ability of the team to maintain the set. A site with 10 badly chosen plugins is more fragile than a site with 20 strictly evaluated and documented plugins. On our projects, the average is around 12 to 18 active plugins.
Do plugins slow down WordPress?
Some yes, others no. The impact depends on the number of SQL requests added, the JavaScript injected, and the hooks used. A well configured cache plugin speeds up the site. A plugin injecting 3 third party scripts on each page can significantly degrade it. The question is not « how many plugins » but « which plugins, and with which configuration ».
Should we buy premium plugins?
On projects in serious production, yes in the vast majority of cases. Premium plugins have economical models that justify support, regular security updates, and the sustainability of the publisher. A free plugin without an economic model is a risk of sustainability to evaluate carefully.
Can we replace some plugins with specific development?
Yes, and it is often the right decision on perimeters well defined: GTM snippet insertion, redirection management algorithms, Custom Gutenberg blocks. The advent of AI as development assistant reduces the cost of this option and makes arbitration more frequent in favour of the specific.
When to use theIA instead of a plugin?
When the need is specific enough for any existing plugin to cover it properly, and when the complexity of the necessary code remains reasonable. The AIA is particularly useful for generating custom API adapters, Gutenberg blocks, migration scripts, or configuration mu-plugins. It is not relevant to replace plugins that have required years of development and testing (Gravity Forms, ACF Pro).
How do I know if a plugin is still maintained?
Three simple signals: check the date of the last update on the repository WordPress.org or GitHub, consult the declared compatibility with the current version of WordPress, and read recent open tickets. A plugin without update for 12 months and with unanswered security tickets is a plugin to replace.
Evolving the stack rather than stacking it
The best plugins are not necessarily the ones that do the most things. These are those that are understood, documented, maintained, and fully assumed in the architecture of the site.
The real question is not « What is the best WordPress plugin? » but « What is the plugin that corresponds to our architecture, to our constraints, and that our team is able to operate over time? »
At Be API, we regularly review our customers' stacks in production. Not to add plugins, but to remove, replace, and simplify them. A WordPress site that ages well is a site whose stack has been governed rigorously, not piled with enthusiasm.
The philosophy is simple: starting from the business need, evaluating all options (plugin, specific development, assisted AI), choosing the most sustainable solution, documenting it, and making it live. It's not glamorous. This is what distinguishes projects that take time from those that accumulate debt.
Have your WordPress stack audited
You inherit a WordPress site whose stack has been enriched over the years? You are preparing a redesign, a version climb or simply want to evaluate its level of maintenance?
Our experts analyze your stack to identify:
- critical plugins to be retained and maintained as a priority;
- redundant plugins to delete;
- accumulated technical debt;
- security risks;
- impact on performance;
- opportunities for simplification;
- where a specific development is a more relevant alternative than a plugin.
The goal is to help you have a easier, longer-lasting and easier to evolve stack.
Want to take stock of your WordPress architecture? Contact Be API
